🔗 Share this article

Commentators have alleged the German head of government, Friedrich Merz, of adopting what they call “dangerous” language regarding immigration, after he called for “very large scale” expulsions of individuals from cities – and claimed that parents of girls would support his stance.

Unapologetic Position

Merz, who became chancellor in May with a pledge to address the rise of the far-right AfD party, this week rebuked a journalist who questioned whether he wished to revise his tough remarks on immigration from last week considering extensive criticism, or express regret for them.

“I am unsure if you have kids, and girls among them,” Merz said to the journalist. “Speak with your female children, I suspect you’ll get a quite unambiguous answer. I have nothing to take back; on the contrary I emphasize: it is necessary to alter certain things.”

Political Reaction

The left-leaning opposition charged the chancellor of emulating extremist parties, whose claims that female individuals are being victimized by immigrants with sexual violence has become a international right-wing mantra.

Ricarda Lang, accused Merz of promoting a dismissive statement for young women that ignored their genuine policy priorities.

“It is possible ‘the daughters’ are also displeased with Merz being interested about their freedoms and safety when he can use them to justify his entirely outdated strategies?” she posted on social media.

Protection Priority

Friedrich Merz declared his main focus was “safety in public areas” and highlighted that provided that it could be ensured “would the conventional groups restore confidence”.

He received backlash last week for remarks that opponents claimed suggested that diversity itself was a issue in the nation’s metropolitan areas: “Certainly we continue to have this challenge in the cityscape, and that is why the federal interior minister is now striving to allow and conduct removals on a extensive basis,” Merz said during a visit to Brandenburg adjacent to Berlin.

Discrimination Allegations

The leader of the Greens in Brandenburg accused Merz of inciting racial prejudice with his comment, which provoked minor protests in multiple cities across Germany at the weekend.

“It is harmful when incumbent parties seek to characterize people as a problem according to their looks or origin,” stated.

Natalie Pawlik of the Social Democrats, coalition partners in the ruling coalition, said: “Migration cannot be labeled negatively with reductive or popularist kneejerk reactions – such approaches split the public even further and eventually assists the incorrect individuals rather than encouraging resolutions.”

Political Context

Merz’s CDU/CSU bloc achieved a unsatisfactory 28.5% result in the February general election versus the anti-migrant, anti-Islam Alternative für Deutschland with its unprecedented 20.8%.

Afterwards, the extremist party has matched with the CDU/CSU, even overtaking it in some polls, in the context of voter fears around migration, lawlessness and economic stagnation.

Previous Positions

Friedrich Merz gained prominence of his political group vowing a tougher line on migration than the longtime CDU chancellor Merkel, dismissing her “we can do it” catchphrase from the migrant crisis a decade ago and giving her part of the blame for the growth of the far-right party.

He has fostered an sometimes heightened demagogic language than his predecessor, famously attributing fault to “small pashas” for frequent vandalism on the year-end celebration and asylum seekers for filling up dentist appointments at the expense of local residents.

Political Strategy

Merz’s party gathered on Sunday and Monday to formulate a strategy ahead of five state elections in the coming year. The AfD has strong leads in several eastern states, flirting with a unprecedented 40% support.

The chancellor maintained that his party was in agreement in prohibiting cooperation in administration with the Alternative für Deutschland, a approach widely known as the “barrier”.

Party Concerns

Nevertheless, the latest survey results has concerned certain CDU members, causing a small number of party officials and consultants to indicate in recent weeks that the approach could be impractical and harmful in the long run.

The critics contend that as long as the AfD established twelve years ago, which domestic security authorities have categorized as far-right, is in a position to criticize without responsibility without having to implement the difficult decisions governing requires, it will benefit from the governing party disadvantage affecting many western democracies.

Study Results

Scholars in the country have determined that mainstream parties such as the CDU were increasingly allowing the right-wing to set the agenda, inadvertently legitimising their concepts and circulating them to a greater extent.

Even though Friedrich Merz avoided using the phrase “protection” on this week, he asserted there were “fundamental differences” with the AfD which would make collaboration unfeasible.

“We accept this challenge,” he stated. “We will now also show explicitly and very explicit the far-right party’s beliefs. We will separate ourselves distinctly and very explicitly from them. {Above all