🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager could survive a loss to Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Over Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach only to dismiss him for using too much that system. Hire the process guy and later bin them for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.